If we assume Google is a wiggledog of alphabet (lel) agencies, it would want to wiggle off all deviants and provide a single platform one can exploit in a predictable way and not others. In a subscription-model fashion, they benefit from having an ever moving window of vulnerabilities so their clients need to get the latest ones or otherwise they wouldn’t work. I slightly remember an article concerning russian cops using old Pegasus to dig into someone’s iphone and israelis commenting that it is outdated by a couple of years and is not applicable to modern models.
Privacy-focused OSes and apps out of their control introduce deviances Google doesn’t want to account for, so they establish a total monopoly.
There should be something more than we have now to tell Google should cool the fuck down.
Well, it opened a pptx with embedded videos without a problem. That’s nice!
What Gander name means?
edit: Also, I’m not informed in the very least what security measures may apply here, I mean against random files users may open. It would not hurt to consult with an expert.