About a decade ago I tried to create an alternative to Google, using the Dewey Decimal System to group web domains by subject matter. My vision was that the website was a library, and domains were individual books. Rankings were a mixture of domain reputation and cultural significance.

The OCLC is very protective of their IP, and likes to sue.

Needless to say, my project was shut down before even getting off the ground.

I’m working on reviving the project, under a new classification system (The Open Categorization System), and would love any help I can get.

The project can be found here: https://github.com/ki4jgt/Open-Catalog-System

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    2·
    2 days ago

    One idea that I think would be neat would be to expand it beyond written texts. For example: https://chewydecimalsystem.org/

    I am somewhat biased in this regard too though, while physical location has to be tied to a singular thing, with digital mapping tag systems, even better if they are scalable, make for much more accurate catalogs.

    For example the arch wiki is a reference source, but of what info? Hierachical stacking helps but falls apart when now the gaming sections of the arch wiki can’t be found next to the Windows gaming sections because they are isolated by OS instead of by gaming, or you are digging through every OSs collection of gaming information when you do have an OS specific question.

    • ki4jgt@feddit.orgOP
      2·
      17 hours ago

      That’s because sites have stopped indexing their own info, because of Google.

      Also, I’ve toyed with the idea of creating product categorization with a Dewey knock off. I’d be happy to catalog your site, if you did.

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.caEnglish
    8·
    4 days ago

    I’m curious as to why you’d limit this to the domain level. A university for example might have thousands of URLs in it with wildly different subjects:

    • university.tld/math/student-name/thesis-on-mathy-subject/
    • university.tld/journalism/student-name/big-story-about-politics

    How would your system account for this?

    • Radieschen@slrpnk.net
      2·
      4 days ago

      I’m guessing that people would just find the content with the site’s own navigation / search mechanism.

      I don’t really see how it would make sense to replicate URLs below a domain level. Or how it would be manageable.

      • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.caEnglish
        3·
        3 days ago

        and I don’t see any value in limiting classification to the domain level. How would one classify wikipedia.org in this scenario? Would it not make more sense to define an open standard that’d leverage this system but allow domain managers to define it themselves?

        To take my university.tld as the example, that university might host a file called at https://university.tld/ocs.json that looks something like this:

        {
  "/": "EDU"
  "/math": "MAT",
  "/journalism": "JOU",
}

        (Heads up to OP: there’s no journalism in your current spec. That feels like an oversight.)

        This would allow the high-content site admins to classify parts of the site differently. The /ocs.json file might even be dynamically generated for complex sites like Wikipedia.

        • ki4jgt@feddit.orgOP
          2·
          3 days ago

          Wikipedia would be inf.ref.enc. Webster and Urban Dictionary? inf.ref.dic.

          Standard library locations.

          As far as the university goes, the system’s incomplete.

          A library has books on several universities, but the book can only be in one place.

          • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.caEnglish
            1·
            3 days ago

            Well if you do decide to attach it exclusively to domains, you might want to consider developing a DNS TXT standard format so this sort of information can be stored in DNS and cached accordingly.