Despite being pretty universally anti-LLM the existence of your own ticket and change management system at least indicates that you’ve thought a lot about this.

Like others have said I wouldn’t expect a great deal of community or outside contribution, it’s LLM generated and, quality aside, that sort of thing rarely generates excitement from others. LLMs are atomizing like that.

But if this fits your use case than I’m happy for you. Maybe make some human commits? The idea of an infinite canvas tab bar is fun at the very least and reminds me of vxwm

I’ll do you one better.

Emacs Org mode, Logseq, Vi + .MD files + grep.

I’m partial to that last one. Un-ironically I would use the closed source Obsidian before this.

I guess it depends on what we mean by “using an LLM”. I’m definitely more conservative than most but for me I draw the line at permitting an LLM to author code; while not ideal I can accept using it has a fuzzer and static analysis tool.

The community will have to agree to what its pain tolerance is and enforce that position.

No OpenBSD/NetBSD?

Removed. AI is fundamentally anti open-source.

The code could be perfect. Doesn’t matter; it’s slop.

Every line could be immaculate, idiomatic code. It’s slop.

This could cure cancer and it would still be slop.

There is nothing you could do to make these projects anything other than slop. Absolutely nothing can be done. They are ontologically slop.

And by extension so are you.

Nope.

Super easy to not use it. Mad easy. Mind blowingly easy.

And the benefit is, much like art, I can feel good about the software I’m using. I can connect to the developer when I read their code and try and think of what they wanted to accomplish, line by line.

No such satisfaction with the slop-factory. Just joyless masturbation.